Tortious liability of the Crown or State.

Law of Torts

English lawThe old and fundamental principle of English Constitution is that the ‘King can do no wrong’. This maxim means that the King is not personally liable for any wrongful act, in other words no action can be brought against him in a court of law. An act done by the king is not a … Read more

Aims of the Law of Torts

Law of Torts

The aim of the law of torts refers to the overarching purpose or objective of this branch of civil law. The law of torts aims to provide a legal framework for individuals who have suffered harm or injury as a result of the wrongful actions or omissions of others. Although a tort is essentially a … Read more

Is it the law of Tort or Law of Torts ?

Law of Torts

A question is generally asked whether there is any general principle of liability in tort. The question is often posed in the form, “Is there a law of tort or only a law of torts?” The two views are set out in the question that SALMOND asked: There are the following twocompeting theories in this … Read more

Difference between Tort and Bailment

Law of Torts

Tort and bailment are two distinct legal concepts that serve different purposes in common law jurisdictions. Tort is a civil wrong that involves a breach of a legal duty owed by one party to another, while bailment is the transfer of possession of property from one party to another for a specific purpose. Section 148 … Read more

Difference between tort and breach of trust

Law of Torts

Tort and breach of trust are two distinct legal concepts that serve different purposes in common law jurisdictions. Tort is a civil wrong that involves a breach of a legal duty owed by one party to another, while breach of trust is a violation of the fiduciary duties owed by a trustee to the beneficiaries … Read more