Rule of Novus Actus Interveniens

Novus Actus Interveniens literally means, “a new intervening act”. As a general rule, damage is said to be too remote where it is caused by the intervening act of human volition of a third party, or when the injury to the plaintiff might have been occasioned by the intervening act of volition on the partof … Read more

Remoteness of Damages

According to the doctrine of Remoteness of Damages, damages are said to be too remote, where the causal connection between it and the defendant’s act is regarded by the law as not sufficiently direct to create responsibility. It is also known as the doctrine of Natural and Probable Consequence. This doctrine is also expressed by … Read more

Weekly Legal Updates (11 June to 17 June 2023)

Weekly Legal Updates

Weekly Legal Updates main objective is to update the legal knowledge of law students, lawyers, academicians and other professionals. If we do not update our legal knowledge regularly, our knowledge become redundant. Trouble for Rapido, Uber! Supreme Court stays Delhi HC order allowing bike taxis to ply In a big blow for bike taxi operators, … Read more

Surveyor Report in an insurance claim is inconclusive and not binding on the insured or the insurer: NCDRC

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) observed that the surveyor’s report of the incident can act as a prerequisite for the insurance claim but it is neither conclusive in nature nor binding on the parties. The bench of the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) led by presiding member, Justice R.K. Agrawal, made a significant … Read more

Consumer Commissions can’t decide complaints involving highly disputed facts, criminal or tortious acts: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court reiterated recently that Consumer courts cannot decide complaints involving highly disputed questions of facts or the cases involving tortious acts or criminality like fraud or cheating, . It said that the concept of “deficiency in service” under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 must be distinguished from the criminal or tortious acts. The … Read more

Is malice relevant in Nuisance?

A lawful act does not become unlawful merely because it has been done with a bad motive and unlawful act does not become lawful because it has been done with good motive. This principle has been laid down by the House of Lords in the case of Brandford Corporation v. Pickals. The House of Lord … Read more